SILK Plus for Bone Health, soymilk vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Plus for Bone Health, soymilk
4 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
7 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Plus for Bone Health, soymilk | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 41 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 54% more |
| Protein | 2.47 g ★ | 2.01 g | SILK Plus for Bone Health, soymilk has 23% more |
| Carbs | 4.53 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Fat | 1.44 g | 0.15 g ★ | SILK Plus for Bone Health, soymilk has 860% more |
| Fiber | 0.8 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 76% more |
| Sugar | 2.88 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 56% more |
| Sodium | 39 mg | 36 mg ★ | SILK Plus for Bone Health, soymilk has 8% more |
| Calcium | 165 mg ★ | 38 mg | SILK Plus for Bone Health, soymilk has 334% more |
| Iron | 0.44 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 123 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.