SILK Unsweetened, soymilk vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Unsweetened, soymilk
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Unsweetened, soymilk | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 33 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Protein | 2.88 g ★ | 2.01 g | SILK Unsweetened, soymilk has 43% more |
| Carbs | 1.65 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 92% more |
| Fat | 1.65 g | 0.15 g ★ | SILK Unsweetened, soymilk has 1000% more |
| Fiber | 0.4 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 88% more |
| Sugar | 0.41 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Sodium | 35 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Calcium | 123 mg ★ | 38 mg | SILK Unsweetened, soymilk has 224% more |
| Iron | 0.44 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 36% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 123 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.