Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 638 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 432% more |
| Protein | 6.02 g ★ | 4.4 g | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 37% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 67.83 g | 1.92 g ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 3433% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg | 7 mg ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 271% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 59% more |
| Iron | 0.6 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 60% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 38% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.