Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 638 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 609% more |
| Protein | 6.02 g ★ | 2.01 g | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 200% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 67.83 g | 0.15 g ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, raw has 45120% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 26 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 28% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 82% more |
| Iron | 0.6 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 13% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 107 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 77% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.