Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 231 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 93% more |
| Protein | 30.1 g ★ | 4.4 g | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 584% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 11.39 g | 1.92 g ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 493% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 87 mg | 7 mg ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 1143% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg ★ | 17 mg | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 29% more |
| Iron | 1.15 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 23% more |
| Potassium | 325 mg ★ | 172 mg | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 89% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.