Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 231 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 157% more |
| Protein | 30.1 g ★ | 2.01 g | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 1398% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 11.39 g | 0.15 g ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 7493% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 87 mg | 36 mg ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 142% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Iron | 1.15 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, cooked has 67% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 325 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.