Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw
3 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
7 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 144 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 20% more |
| Protein | 19.35 g ★ | 4.4 g | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 340% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 6.77 g | 1.92 g ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 253% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg | 7 mg ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 1071% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 12% more |
| Iron | 0.83 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 44% more |
| Potassium | 315 mg ★ | 172 mg | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean and fat, raw has 83% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.