Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 112 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw has 24% more |
| Protein | 20.2 g ★ | 2.01 g | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw has 905% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 2.87 g | 0.15 g ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw has 1813% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 86 mg | 36 mg ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw has 139% more |
| Calcium | 15 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 61% more |
| Iron | 0.85 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable lean only, raw has 23% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 328 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 31% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.