Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 297 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised has 94% more |
| Protein | 28.94 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised has 18% more |
| Fat | 19.17 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised has 263% more |
| Sodium | 47 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 48% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised has 100% more |
| Iron | 2.42 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, braised has 438% more |
| Potassium | 231 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 47% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.