Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 207 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 35% more |
| Protein | 25.7 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 5% more |
| Fat | 10.84 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 105% more |
| Sodium | 71 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 21% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 3.05 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 578% more |
| Potassium | 367 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.