Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 172 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 12% more |
| Protein | 26.82 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 9% more |
| Fat | 6.34 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 3.2 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, roasted has 611% more |
| Potassium | 385 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 12% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.