Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 171 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 4% more |
| Protein | 25.95 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 16% more |
| Fat | 6.69 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 87% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg ★ | 74 mg | Equal |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 3.2 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 208% more |
| Potassium | 386 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, roasted has 51% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.