Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 172 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 4% more |
| Protein | 28.09 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 9% more |
| Fat | 5.82 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 63% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg ★ | 74 mg | Equal |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 3.19 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 207% more |
| Potassium | 384 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, clod roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, roasted has 50% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.