Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 128 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Protein | 21.13 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 32% more |
| Fat | 4.79 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 34% more |
| Sodium | 80 mg | 74 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 8% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Iron | 2.43 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 134% more |
| Potassium | 343 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 34% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.