Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 131 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 21% more |
| Protein | 21.19 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 32% more |
| Fat | 5.18 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 45% more |
| Sodium | 82 mg | 74 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 11% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Iron | 2.5 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 140% more |
| Potassium | 347 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.