Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 122 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 26% more |
| Protein | 21.05 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 32% more |
| Fat | 4.2 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 18% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg | 74 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 3% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Iron | 2.25 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 116% more |
| Potassium | 341 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.