Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 25% more |
| Protein | 21.3 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 31% more |
| Fat | 4.17 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 17% more |
| Sodium | 81 mg | 74 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 9% more |
| Calcium | 11 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 27% more |
| Iron | 2.44 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 135% more |
| Potassium | 346 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.