Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 160 kcal ★ | 165 kcal | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 3% more |
| Protein | 25.87 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 17% more |
| Fat | 5.52 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 55% more |
| Sodium | 71 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 4% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 47% more |
| Iron | 2.93 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 182% more |
| Potassium | 293 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 14% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.