Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled
4 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 161 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 5% more |
| Protein | 25.74 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 5% more |
| Fat | 5.69 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 8% more |
| Sodium | 73 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 19% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg ★ | 8 mg | Equal |
| Iron | 3.02 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, mock tender steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, broiled has 571% more |
| Potassium | 293 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 33% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.