Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 235 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 42% more |
| Protein | 17.48 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 44% more |
| Fat | 18.33 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 413% more |
| Sodium | 78 mg | 74 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 5% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
| Iron | 2.24 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 115% more |
| Potassium | 277 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, short ribs, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 8% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.