Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 176 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 15% more |
| Protein | 18.99 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
| Fat | 10.52 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 99% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 18% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
| Iron | 2.36 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, shoulder clod, top blade, steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 424% more |
| Potassium | 309 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.