Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 47% more |
| Protein | 25.73 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 15% more |
| Fat | 11.73 g | 2.08 g ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 464% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 32% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 9 mg ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 22% more |
| Iron | 2.76 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 289% more |
| Potassium | 299 mg ★ | 249 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.