Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 200 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 21% more |
| Protein | 25.67 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 17% more |
| Fat | 9.99 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 180% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 9% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 53% more |
| Iron | 2.74 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 163% more |
| Potassium | 298 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, top blade, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 16% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.