Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 216 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 31% more |
| Protein | 30.68 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 1% more |
| Fat | 9.44 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 164% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg ★ | 74 mg | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 9% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 7% more |
| Iron | 3.18 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 206% more |
| Potassium | 306 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 20% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.