Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 196 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 28% more |
| Protein | 19.17 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 22% more |
| Fat | 13.26 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 151% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 16% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 50% more |
| Iron | 2.19 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, raw has 387% more |
| Potassium | 336 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.