Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw
4 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 202 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 37% more |
| Protein | 19.15 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 36% more |
| Fat | 13.93 g | 2.08 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 570% more |
| Sodium | 76 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 23% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg ★ | 9 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 33% more |
| Iron | 2.13 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 200% more |
| Potassium | 329 mg ★ | 249 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, raw has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.