Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
2 wins
🏆
Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 187 kcal | 165 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 13% more |
| Protein | 19.2 g | 31.02 g ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 38% more |
| Fat | 12.27 g | 3.57 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 244% more |
| Sodium | 77 mg | 74 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 4% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg | 15 mg ★ | Chicken, broilers or fryers, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 20% more |
| Iron | 2.27 mg ★ | 1.04 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 118% more |
| Potassium | 347 mg ★ | 256 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 36% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.