Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 134 kcal ★ | 153 kcal | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 12% more |
| Protein | 21.03 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 14% more |
| Carbs | 0.19 g ★ | 0 g | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 0% more |
| Fat | 5.41 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 2% more |
| Sodium | 81 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 10% more |
| Calcium | 12 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 50% more |
| Iron | 2.43 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade pot roast or steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, raw has 440% more |
| Potassium | 380 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.