Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 284 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 93% more |
| Protein | 27.6 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 8% more |
| Fat | 19.3 g | 2.08 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 828% more |
| Sodium | 64 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 35% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 9 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 56% more |
| Iron | 2.82 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 297% more |
| Potassium | 275 mg ★ | 249 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 10% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.