Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised vs Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised
4 wins
🏆
Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted
3 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 261 kcal | 147 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 78% more |
| Protein | 29.18 g | 30.13 g ★ | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 3% more |
| Fat | 16.05 g | 2.08 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 672% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg ★ | 99 mg | Turkey, whole, breast, meat only, cooked, roasted has 33% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 9 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 56% more |
| Iron | 2.76 mg ★ | 0.71 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 289% more |
| Potassium | 270 mg ★ | 249 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 8% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.