Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised vs Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised
6 wins
🏆
Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 215 kcal | 130 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 65% more |
| Protein | 32.01 g ★ | 2.69 g | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 1090% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 28.17 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 9.66 g | 0.28 g ★ | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 3350% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 0.4 g ★ | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.05 g | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg ★ | 382 mg | Rice, white, long-grain, regular, cooked, unenriched, with salt has 83% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg ★ | 10 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 40% more |
| Iron | 3.15 mg ★ | 0.2 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 1475% more |
| Potassium | 303 mg ★ | 35 mg | Beef, chuck, under blade steak, boneless, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, braised has 766% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.