Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 276 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 80% more |
| Protein | 23.96 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 3% more |
| Fat | 19.27 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 265% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 2.94 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 553% more |
| Potassium | 299 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 32% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.