Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA choice, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA choice, cooked, broiled
2 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
5 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA choice, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 283 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA choice, cooked, broiled has 85% more |
| Protein | 23.61 g | 24.58 g ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 4% more |
| Fat | 20.15 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA choice, cooked, broiled has 282% more |
| Sodium | 65 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 28% more |
| Calcium | 7 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 13% more |
| Iron | 2.96 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 0" fat, USDA choice, cooked, broiled has 558% more |
| Potassium | 278 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 37% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.