Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled
3 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
4 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 39% more |
| Protein | 26.07 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 6% more |
| Fat | 11.18 g | 5.28 g ★ | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 112% more |
| Sodium | 69 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 23% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 8 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
| Iron | 3.24 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, short loin, porterhouse steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, all grades, cooked, broiled has 620% more |
| Potassium | 328 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 25% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.