Beef, top sirloin, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled vs Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, top sirloin, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled
5 wins
🏆
Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat
2 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, top sirloin, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 177 kcal | 153 kcal ★ | Beef, top sirloin, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 16% more |
| Protein | 30.8 g ★ | 24.58 g | Beef, top sirloin, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 25% more |
| Fat | 5.03 g ★ | 5.28 g | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 5% more |
| Sodium | 66 mg ★ | 90 mg | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 27% more |
| Calcium | 22 mg ★ | 8 mg | Beef, top sirloin, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 175% more |
| Iron | 1.92 mg ★ | 0.45 mg | Beef, top sirloin, steak, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, select, cooked, broiled has 327% more |
| Potassium | 410 mg | 439 mg ★ | Fish, salmon, pink, cooked, dry heat has 7% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.