Emu, fan fillet, raw vs Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Emu, fan fillet, raw
5 wins
🏆
Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Emu, fan fillet, raw | Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 103 kcal | 35 kcal ★ | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 194% more |
| Protein | 22.5 g ★ | 2.38 g | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 845% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 7.18 g ★ | Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.8 g | 0.41 g ★ | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 95% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 1.39 g | Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 120 mg ★ | 262 mg | Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 54% more |
| Calcium | 3 mg | 40 mg ★ | Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 93% more |
| Iron | 4.5 mg ★ | 0.67 mg | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 572% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 64.9 mg ★ | Broccoli, cooked, boiled, drained, with salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 300 mg ★ | 293 mg | Emu, fan fillet, raw has 2% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.