Fish, burbot, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, burbot, raw
6 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
4 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, burbot, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 90 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 25% more |
| Protein | 19.31 g ★ | 4.4 g | Fish, burbot, raw has 339% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.81 g ★ | 1.92 g | Quinoa, cooked has 58% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 97 mg | 7 mg ★ | Fish, burbot, raw has 1286% more |
| Calcium | 50 mg ★ | 17 mg | Fish, burbot, raw has 194% more |
| Iron | 0.9 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 40% more |
| Potassium | 404 mg ★ | 172 mg | Fish, burbot, raw has 135% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.