Fish, burbot, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Fish, burbot, raw
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Fish, burbot, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 90 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Equal |
| Protein | 19.31 g ★ | 2.01 g | Fish, burbot, raw has 861% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.81 g | 0.15 g ★ | Fish, burbot, raw has 440% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 97 mg | 36 mg ★ | Fish, burbot, raw has 169% more |
| Calcium | 50 mg ★ | 38 mg | Fish, burbot, raw has 32% more |
| Iron | 0.9 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Fish, burbot, raw has 30% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 404 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 15% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.