Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 259 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered has 188% more |
| Protein | 32.42 g ★ | 2.01 g | Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered has 1513% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 13.39 g | 0.15 g ★ | Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered has 8827% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 71 mg | 36 mg ★ | Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered has 97% more |
| Calcium | 5 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 87% more |
| Iron | 10.73 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Game meat, bear, cooked, simmered has 1455% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 263 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.