Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 134 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted has 49% more |
| Protein | 29.27 g ★ | 2.01 g | Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted has 1356% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 0.97 g | 0.15 g ★ | Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted has 547% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 69 mg | 36 mg ★ | Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted has 92% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Iron | 4.22 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Game meat, moose, cooked, roasted has 512% more |
| Vitamin C | 5 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Potassium | 334 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 30% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.