Naranjilla (lulo) pulp, frozen, unsweetened vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Naranjilla (lulo) pulp, frozen, unsweetened
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Naranjilla (lulo) pulp, frozen, unsweetened | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 25 kcal ★ | 90 kcal | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Protein | 0.44 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 78% more |
| Carbs | 5.9 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 72% more |
| Fat | 0.22 g | 0.15 g ★ | Naranjilla (lulo) pulp, frozen, unsweetened has 47% more |
| Fiber | 1.1 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 67% more |
| Sugar | 3.74 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 42% more |
| Sodium | 4 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Calcium | 8 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 79% more |
| Iron | 0.35 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 49% more |
| Vitamin C | 3.2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 84% more |
| Potassium | 200 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.