Oil, olive, salad or cooking vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Oil, olive, salad or cooking
2 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
9 wins
| Nutrient | Oil, olive, salad or cooking | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 884 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Oil, olive, salad or cooking has 882% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 100 g | 0.15 g ★ | Oil, olive, salad or cooking has 66567% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 2 mg ★ | 36 mg | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 94% more |
| Calcium | 1 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 97% more |
| Iron | 0.56 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 19% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 1 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.