Ostrich, tenderloin, raw vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Ostrich, tenderloin, raw
4 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
6 wins
| Nutrient | Ostrich, tenderloin, raw | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 123 kcal | 120 kcal ★ | Ostrich, tenderloin, raw has 3% more |
| Protein | 22.07 g ★ | 4.4 g | Ostrich, tenderloin, raw has 402% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Fat | 3.19 g | 1.92 g ★ | Ostrich, tenderloin, raw has 66% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 86 mg | 7 mg ★ | Ostrich, tenderloin, raw has 1129% more |
| Calcium | 6 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 65% more |
| Iron | 4.88 mg ★ | 1.49 mg | Ostrich, tenderloin, raw has 228% more |
| Potassium | 320 mg ★ | 172 mg | Ostrich, tenderloin, raw has 86% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.