SILK Original Creamer vs Quinoa, cooked
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Original Creamer
2 wins
🏆
Quinoa, cooked
8 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Original Creamer | Quinoa, cooked | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 kcal ★ | 120 kcal | Quinoa, cooked has 17% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 4.4 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Carbs | 6.67 g | 21.3 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 69% more |
| Fat | 6.67 g | 1.92 g ★ | SILK Original Creamer has 247% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 2.8 g ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 0.87 g | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg | 7 mg ★ | SILK Original Creamer has 857% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 17 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 1.49 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 172 mg ★ | Quinoa, cooked has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.