SILK Original Creamer vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
SILK Original Creamer
1 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
10 wins
| Nutrient | SILK Original Creamer | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 100 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | SILK Original Creamer has 11% more |
| Protein | 0 g | 2.01 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Carbs | 6.67 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 68% more |
| Fat | 6.67 g | 0.15 g ★ | SILK Original Creamer has 4347% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg | 36 mg ★ | SILK Original Creamer has 86% more |
| Calcium | 0 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Iron | 0 mg | 0.69 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 0 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.