Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 642 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 613% more |
| Protein | 9.42 g ★ | 2.01 g | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 369% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 66.74 g | 0.15 g ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 44393% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 57 mg | 36 mg ★ | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 58% more |
| Calcium | 4 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 89% more |
| Iron | 1 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Veal, composite of trimmed retail cuts, separable fat, cooked has 45% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 173 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 64% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.