Beans, baked, canned, with pork vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beans, baked, canned, with pork
5 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
6 wins
| Nutrient | Beans, baked, canned, with pork | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 106 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beans, baked, canned, with pork has 18% more |
| Protein | 5.19 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beans, baked, canned, with pork has 158% more |
| Carbs | 19.99 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 3% more |
| Fat | 1.55 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beans, baked, canned, with pork has 933% more |
| Fiber | 5.5 g ★ | 3.3 g | Beans, baked, canned, with pork has 67% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 414 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beans, baked, canned, with pork has 1050% more |
| Calcium | 53 mg ★ | 38 mg | Beans, baked, canned, with pork has 39% more |
| Iron | 1.7 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beans, baked, canned, with pork has 146% more |
| Vitamin C | 2 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 90% more |
| Potassium | 309 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 35% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.