Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 212 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 136% more |
| Protein | 33.36 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 1560% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 7.67 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 5013% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 54 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 50% more |
| Calcium | 14 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 63% more |
| Iron | 2.89 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 0" fat, choice, cooked, braised has 319% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 262 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 45% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.