Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 132 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw has 47% more |
| Protein | 22.11 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw has 1000% more |
| Carbs | 0 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Fat | 4.19 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw has 2693% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 74 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw has 106% more |
| Calcium | 16 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 58% more |
| Iron | 1.93 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, chuck, arm pot roast, separable lean only, trimmed to 1/8" fat, all grades, raw has 180% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 337 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 29% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.