Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw vs Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
Nutrition comparison per 100g
🏆
Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw
3 wins
🏆
Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt
8 wins
| Nutrient | Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Calories | 268 kcal | 90 kcal ★ | Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 198% more |
| Protein | 16.98 g ★ | 2.01 g | Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 745% more |
| Carbs | 0.97 g | 20.71 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 95% more |
| Fat | 21.31 g | 0.15 g ★ | Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 14107% more |
| Fiber | 0 g | 3.3 g ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sugar | 0 g ★ | 6.48 g | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Sodium | 67 mg | 36 mg ★ | Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 86% more |
| Calcium | 10 mg | 38 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 74% more |
| Iron | 2.01 mg ★ | 0.69 mg | Beef, chuck, blade roast, separable lean and fat, trimmed to 1/8" fat, choice, raw has 191% more |
| Vitamin C | 0 mg | 19.6 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 100% more |
| Potassium | 267 mg | 475 mg ★ | Sweet potato, cooked, baked in skin, flesh, without salt has 44% more |
Compare Food Groups
Compare whole food groups for a cleaner, averaged breakdown.